NewLaunching String Web Access APIRead the manifesto →
← Comparisons

Best SerpApi Alternatives in 2026: 7 Tools Compared

Bruce Magness, Chief of Staff, String · Updated October 19, 2026

Last updated: October 19, 2026. We ran String's search API on the same 58 questions twice on October 15, 2026, and compared both runs with an October 13 run. We hold no key for the other six APIs, so they are described from their own pricing pages and docs, re-checked October 19, and marked Not tested. String publishes this page and sells a Google search API, so read our picks with that in mind.

The best SerpApi alternatives in 2026 are String, Serper, SearchApi, DataForSEO, Bright Data and Scrapingdog. Each returns Google results as JSON for less than SerpApi's $15.00 per 1,000 searches on its $75 Developer plan. Serper and String cost $1.00 per 1,000. DataForSEO is cheapest for batches that can wait. String also returns the AI Overview in the same call and fetches the result pages on the same key. Our October 15 test adds one more buying fact: Google's results order changed on 50 of 56 queries between two calls 31 minutes apart.

TL;DR

  • Six alternatives, one job. String, Serper, SearchApi, DataForSEO, Bright Data and Scrapingdog all return Google's results page as JSON, like SerpApi.
  • Price at the plan nearest $100 a month runs from $0.45 per 1,000 (Scrapingdog Light) to $15.00 (SerpApi Developer). String and Serper sit at $1.00.
  • Five of the seven say they bill only successful searches. Serper and DataForSEO state no failed-request rule on the pages we read.
  • Google's results move fast. Between two String calls 31 minutes apart, the top results changed order on 50 of 56 questions. Between October 13 and October 15, the list of domains changed order on 54 of 56.
  • A Google results page is not ten links. On 55 of 56 questions Google showed fewer than 10 organic results, a median of 8. On 54 it carried an AI Overview.
  • SerpApi caches a repeat query for one hour and serves the cached copy free unless you set no_cache. That is a cost saving and a freshness risk.
  • SerpApi publishes its own Google Search API metrics: 93.658% average success and 9.06 s average response time over the last 30 days, read on October 19.

SerpApi and six alternatives at a glance

The anchor is the plan nearest $100 a month billed monthly, by dollar distance. Where a vendor sells no monthly plan, the row uses its pay-as-you-go or top-up rate.

API Price per 1,000 at the anchor Billing rule AI Overview Free tier Tested Oct 15
SerpApi $15.00 (Developer, $75/mo for 5,000) Successful searches only; cached searches free Yes; some need a second request 250 searches a month Not tested
String $1.00 (Growth, $100/mo fee plus usage) Successful requests only, two stated exceptions Yes, same call; the fill bills as 2 searches 5,000 standard requests Yes
Serper $1.00 ($50 top-up for 50,000, valid 6 months) Not stated on the pages we read Not listed on its site 2,500 queries Not tested
SearchApi $2.86 (Production, $100/mo for 35,000) Only 200 responses billed Yes, its own endpoint 100 requests Not tested
DataForSEO $0.60 queued, $1.20 priority, $2.00 live Per task set; AI Overview adds one base price Yes, paid parameter Not checked Not tested
Bright Data $1.50 (pay as you go) Successful requests only Yes, brd_ai_overview=2 5,000 requests a month Not tested
Scrapingdog $0.45 Light, $0.90 Advance (Standard, $90/mo) Failed requests never charged Yes, in the response 100 credits Not tested

Prices come from each vendor's pricing page, checked on October 19, 2026. Each one links to its source in the sections below.

Who String is for, and who it is not for

String fits a team that needs Google's results, the AI Overview and the pages behind the results on one key. One call returns the results page as JSON. A second call on the same key fetches any result URL.

  • For: agent builders who must cite what Google shows; SEO and AI-visibility teams that track AI Overviews and AI Mode; teams that buy a SERP API and a scraping API today and want one contract.
  • Look elsewhere for: Google Flights, Hotels, Scholar or Play Store endpoints. SerpApi covers those Google products; String searches Google, DuckDuckGo, Brave and Mojeek.
  • Price for this job: $1.00 per 1,000 searches on Growth ($100 monthly fee, usage billed on top) and $1.50 on Starter ($20). A search with the AI Overview filled bills as two searches. Source: String pricing docs.
  • Integrations: a hosted MCP server for Claude, Cursor and other MCP clients, plus guides for LangChain and the Vercel AI SDK.
  • Limits: 60 requests a second with a 3,600-request burst, and no concurrency cap. Source: usestring.ai/pricing.

Why teams switch from SerpApi

Price is the first reason. SerpApi's Developer plan buys 5,000 searches for $75 a month, or $15.00 per 1,000 (SerpApi pricing). Serper and String charge $1.00 for the same 1,000.

In November 2024 a user on r/n8n wrote that the free tier's search cap was "quite challenging" and asked "if there might be a more affordable solution available" (thread). SerpApi's free plan now gives 250 searches a month.

Throughput caps come second. Each SerpApi plan has an hourly limit: the Developer plan allows 1,000 searches an hour. SearchApi caps use at 20% of a plan's credits per hour (SearchApi pricing). String has no concurrency cap and a 60-requests-a-second rate.

AI Overviews take extra work on SerpApi. When the overview is not in the first response, SerpApi returns a page_token that "expires within 1 minute", and you send a second request to its AI Overview API (SerpApi docs). String fills the overview in the same call when you set aiOverview: true.

Risk is the newest reason. A developer on r/WebScrapingInsider framed the 2026 choice as "which risk profile are you buying", and named "AI Mode changing what a SERP even is" and "the legal noise around scraped search output" (thread). In January 2026 SerpApi's general counsel wrote that Google had sued SerpApi in December 2025 (SerpApi blog).

The reasons in these threads are a lower price per search, fewer caps and a second vendor to fall back on. Parser quality rarely comes up.

How we tested

We tested String only, because it is the only API on this page we hold a key for. We sent the same 58 buyer questions about web data to String's /v1/search three times:

  1. October 13, 2026, 10:53 to 10:56 UTC (the run behind our best web search APIs page).
  2. October 15, 2026, 10:49 to 10:51 UTC.
  3. October 15, 2026, 11:20 to 11:22 UTC.

Each call used engine google, country US, language en and aiOverview: true, four questions in parallel. We recorded every block String returned: the organic results with their positions and URLs, ads, People also ask, related searches, discussions and the AI Overview.

The October 15 runs answered 56 and 58 of 58. The two misses in the first run were 504 timeouts after about 97 seconds, both on questions about String itself; both answered in the second run. The comparisons below use the 56 questions both runs answered.

This test measures what Google showed and how much it moved. It does not measure SerpApi or the other five APIs, so we do not rank them on success or speed.

Google's results change between two calls

Between two calls 31 minutes apart, Google's organic results changed order on 50 of 56 questions. The top 3 stayed the same on 21. The #1 result changed on 16. On 47 questions at least one URL left the list, a median of 2 per question.

What we compared Questions Identical Changed
Organic URL order, two calls 31 min apart (Oct 15) 56 6 50
Organic URL set, same two calls 56 9 47
#1 result, same two calls 56 40 16
Domain order, Oct 13 vs Oct 15 56 2 54
Domain set, Oct 13 vs Oct 15 56 6 50

Over two days the median question kept 60% of its domains, measured as shared domains over all domains either day returned.

Some of this movement comes from Google answering two requests differently, as well as from time passing. Google can serve two requests from different data centers and IP locations, and any SERP API sees the same effect. Our test cannot split the two causes. It shows what an API user gets back.

Why this matters when you pick a SerpApi alternative:

  • Caching changes what you see. SerpApi serves an identical query from cache for up to an hour, free, unless you set no_cache: true (SerpApi docs). For a dashboard that is fine. For a rank check, one hour is long enough for the order to move.
  • One snapshot is not a rank. If the order moves within the hour, a rank tracker needs several reads, or a stated time for each read.
  • Your bill counts reads, not answers. A team that re-checks every query to get a stable rank pays for each read. At $15.00 per 1,000 that adds up faster than at $1.00.

Want to see how much your own queries move? Run them twice through /v1/search with a free key and compare.

A Google results page is more than ten links

On 55 of the 56 questions String answered on October 15, Google showed fewer than 10 organic results. The median page had 8. The rest of the page went to other blocks.

Block on the page Pages with it (of 56)
AI Overview 54
Related searches 51
People also ask 49
Discussions and forums 24
Ads 1

48 of the 56 pages carried three or more of these blocks. One carried only organic results. Our 58 questions are about web data and APIs, so few carry ads; a shopping query would look different.

What this means for an API choice: an API that returns only organic links misses most of what a person sees. Check that the alternative parses the AI Overview, People also ask and discussions, and check what each one costs. DataForSEO adds one base price for the AI Overview (DataForSEO pricing), and String bills the fill as two searches.

String vs SerpApi: $1.00 vs $15.00 per 1,000, and the AI Overview in one call

String answered 56 of 58 Google searches in the first October 15 run and 58 of 58 in the second. It filled the AI Overview on 54 of the 56 in the first run.

  • Pricing. $1.00 per 1,000 searches on Growth ($100 monthly fee, usage billed on top); $1.50 on Starter ($20). The AI Overview fill bills as two searches. A failed request is not billed, with two exceptions named in the billing docs.
  • What it returns. Organic results, the AI Overview with its sources, People also ask, related searches, discussions, ads and videos, each in its own field. engine: "google_ai_mode" returns Google AI Mode's answer and cited pages (search docs).
  • Strengths. One key for search and fetch. No concurrency cap. Four engines: Google, DuckDuckGo, Brave and Mojeek.
  • Weaknesses. No dedicated endpoints for Google Flights, Hotels, Scholar, Jobs or the Play Store.

Serper vs SerpApi: $1.00 per 1,000 on top-up credits

Serper sells 50,000 Google searches for $50, or $1.00 per 1,000, with credits valid for 6 months (Serper). Not tested.

  • Pricing. No monthly plan. Larger top-ups lower the rate: $0.75 per 1,000 at 500,000 credits, $0.50 at 2.5 million, $0.30 at 12.5 million. 2,500 free queries.
  • What it returns. Parsed Google results, plus images, news, maps, places, shopping and scholar endpoints.
  • Strengths. The simplest price on this page, and up to 50 queries a second on the $50 top-up.
  • Weaknesses. Credits expire after 6 months. Its site does not list AI Overview output or a failed-request rule.

SearchApi vs SerpApi: the closest match on features

SearchApi's Production plan costs $100 a month for 35,000 searches, about $2.86 per 1,000 (SearchApi pricing). The page rounds it to $3. Not tested.

  • Pricing. Developer $40 for 10,000 ($4.00 per 1,000). Only "successful searches with a 200 status code incur charges." 100 free requests, no card.
  • What it returns. Google, Bing, YouTube and many other engines, with separate Google AI Overview and AI Mode endpoints (SearchApi docs).
  • Strengths. A wide engine list like SerpApi's, and a Legal Protection Guarantee of up to $2M on Production and above.
  • Weaknesses. Use is capped at 20% of a plan's credits per hour.

DataForSEO vs SerpApi: the lowest price if you can wait

DataForSEO charges $0.60 per 1,000 results pages in its Standard queue, $1.20 in Priority and $2.00 in Live mode (DataForSEO pricing). Not tested.

  • Pricing. Pay per task, no monthly plan. The Standard queue averages about 5 minutes with a 45-minute target; Live returns in about 6 seconds. A search operator multiplies the price by 5, and the AI Overview adds one base price.
  • What it returns. Google organic results for any location, language and device, plus keyword and ranking data (DataForSEO docs).
  • Strengths. The lowest per-page price for scheduled SEO batches.
  • Weaknesses. Queue mechanics to learn, and the price moves with the parameters you set.

Bright Data vs SerpApi: seven engines and enterprise procurement

Bright Data's SERP API costs $1.50 per 1,000 requests pay as you go, and $499 a month for 380,000 on Scale (Bright Data pricing). Not tested.

  • Pricing. No plan near $100. 5,000 free requests a month. Scale adds requests at $1.30 per 1,000. Its product page advertised "50% OFF all plans" on October 19, so check the price on the day you buy.
  • What it returns. Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo, Yandex, Baidu, Yahoo and Naver results in JSON or HTML (Bright Data SERP API). brd_ai_overview=2 raises the chance of an AI Overview.
  • Strengths. Pay only for successful delivery (Bright Data docs). An async mode where collecting results is free.
  • Weaknesses. Pricing and setup are built for larger buyers.

Scrapingdog vs SerpApi: the lowest monthly plan price

Scrapingdog's Standard plan costs $90 a month for 1,000,000 credits; a Google search costs 5 credits on the Light API and 10 on Advance (Scrapingdog pricing). Not tested.

  • Pricing. $0.45 per 1,000 Light searches or $0.90 per 1,000 Advance searches at Standard. "Failed requests never charged." 100 free credits.
  • What it returns. Organic results, ads, local results, AI Overview and questions (Scrapingdog Google Search API). A Google AI Mode API costs 10 credits.
  • Strengths. The lowest per-search price on a monthly plan here. Credits are shared with Scrapingdog's scraping APIs.
  • Weaknesses. Credits are shared across every endpoint, so search and scraping draw from one pool. See our String vs Scrapingdog page for the scraping side.

What $100 a month buys

  • SerpApi: Developer at $75 buys 5,000 searches; Production at $150 buys 15,000.
  • String: the $100 Growth fee plus usage at $1.00 per 1,000 searches.
  • Serper: $100 in top-ups buys 100,000 searches at $1.00 per 1,000.
  • SearchApi: Production at $100 buys 35,000 searches.
  • DataForSEO: $100 buys about 166,000 queued pages, 83,000 priority or 50,000 live.
  • Bright Data: $100 pay as you go buys about 66,000 requests.
  • Scrapingdog: Standard at $90 buys 200,000 Light or 100,000 Advance searches.

These numbers are not like for like. Units differ: searches, credits, results pages, requests. Some vendors charge extra for the AI Overview, a search operator or a deeper page. Some credits expire. Some plans cap use per hour. Read the billing rule beside each price before you compare.

How String gets your agent Google results

String is the most reliable web scraping API, bypassing anti-bot, and you only pay when content comes back.

  • One call returns the Google results page as JSON. Organic results, AI Overview, People also ask, related searches and discussions each come back in their own field (search docs).
  • The AI Overview fills in the same call. Set aiOverview: true; on October 15 String filled it on 54 of 56 answered questions.
  • Google AI Mode is one parameter away. engine: "google_ai_mode" returns the generated answer with its cited pages.
  • Search and fetch share one key. Every result URL can be read through /v1/fetch on the same bill, so a SERP API and a scraping API become one contract.
  • A failed search costs nothing. String bills only requests that return content, with two stated exceptions in its billing docs.
  • No concurrency cap. The limit is 60 requests a second with a 3,600-request burst (pricing).

Where String fits

String fits when your product needs what Google shows, including the AI Overview and AI Mode, and then needs the pages behind the results. It also fits a team that pays one vendor for SERP data and another for scraping and wants one key.

Which SerpApi alternative should you pick?

Match the tool to the job.

  • Google results, AI Overviews and the result pages on one key: String.
  • The simplest Google JSON at $1.00 per 1,000, no subscription: Serper.
  • SerpApi's breadth of engines at a lower price: SearchApi.
  • Scheduled SEO batches that can wait minutes: DataForSEO.
  • Seven engines and an enterprise contract: Bright Data.
  • The lowest monthly plan price, shared with scraping credits: Scrapingdog.

Stay on SerpApi when you need its Google product endpoints (Flights, Hotels, Scholar, Jobs, Play Store) or its U.S. Legal Shield, and $15.00 per 1,000 fits your volume.

To scrape Google yourself instead of buying an API, our Google search scraping guide shows the code and where it breaks. For search APIs with their own index, such as Perplexity, Exa and Brave, see the best web search APIs.

The same search in SerpApi and String

Both calls ran on October 19, 2026. The SerpApi call follows its Google Search API docs. Without a key, SerpApi answers only its demo query, so we ran this exact code on q="coffee" and it printed the top five results. Your own queries need a SerpApi key.

SerpApi, Python:

import os, requests

resp = requests.get(
    "https://serpapi.com/search",
    params={"engine": "google", "q": "serpapi alternatives", "gl": "us", "hl": "en",
            "api_key": os.environ["SERPAPI_API_KEY"]},
    timeout=60,
)
resp.raise_for_status()
for r in resp.json().get("organic_results", [])[:5]:
    print(r["position"], r["title"], r["link"])

String, Python:

import os, requests

resp = requests.post(
    "https://request.usestring.ai/v1/search",
    headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {os.environ['STRING_API_KEY']}"},
    json={"query": "serpapi alternatives", "engine": "google", "country": "US",
          "language": "en", "aiOverview": True},
    timeout=60,
)
resp.raise_for_status()
data = resp.json()
for r in data["results"][:5]:
    print(r["position"], r["title"], r.get("url"))
overview = (data.get("overviews") or [{}])[0]
print(overview.get("text", "")[:200])

Three changes move a script across: the endpoint, q becomes query, and organic_results[].link becomes results[].url. The String response also carries the AI Overview, so no second request is needed. Run it with a free key from portal.usestring.ai.

FAQ

What are the best SerpApi alternatives for scraping search results?

String, Serper, SearchApi, DataForSEO, Bright Data and Scrapingdog. String and Serper cost $1.00 per 1,000 searches against SerpApi's $15.00 on Developer. String also returns the AI Overview in the same call. DataForSEO is cheapest for batches that can wait.

Is SerpApi the cheapest SERP API?

No. At the plan nearest $100 a month, SerpApi costs $15.00 per 1,000 searches. Scrapingdog costs $0.45 on its Light API, DataForSEO $0.60 in its Standard queue, and String and Serper $1.00. Units and extra charges differ, so compare the billing rules too.

Which API is better, SearchApi or SerpApi?

They are close on features: both cover many engines and offer AI Overview and AI Mode endpoints. SearchApi costs about $2.86 per 1,000 on its $100 plan against SerpApi's $15.00 on its $75 plan. SearchApi caps use at 20% of plan credits per hour; SerpApi caps searches per hour by plan.

Are there free alternatives to SerpApi?

Every API here has a free tier. Bright Data gives 5,000 requests a month, Serper 2,500 queries, SerpApi itself 250 searches a month, SearchApi 100 requests and Scrapingdog 100 credits. String's first 5,000 standard requests are free with no card.

Is there an open-source SerpApi alternative?

SearXNG is an open-source metasearch engine you host yourself (SearXNG on GitHub). It sends your query to other engines and merges the results. You run the servers and handle blocks yourself. One developer who tried a do-it-yourself Google scraper reported "captchas within like 20 requests" (r/scrapingtheweb).

Is SerpApi illegal?

SerpApi, LLC sells its API openly and lists a "U.S. Legal Shield" on every plan. In January 2026 its general counsel wrote that Google sued SerpApi in December 2025, and that SerpApi disputes the claims (SerpApi blog). We have not checked the current status of the case. For the general law on scraping public pages, see is web scraping legal.

SerpApi vs a general scraping API for Google results: which do I need?

A SERP API like SerpApi parses Google's results page into JSON for you. A general scraping API returns the page, and you parse it. If you only need Google results, a SERP API is less work. If you also need the pages behind the results, String sells both on one key.

How much do Google search results change between API calls?

In our October 15, 2026 test, Google's organic results changed order on 50 of 56 questions between two calls 31 minutes apart. Between October 13 and October 15, the order of domains changed on 54 of 56 questions.

Sources

Best Web Search APIs in 2026: 9 APIs ComparedUpdated October 13, 2026Best Web Scraping APIs in 2026: 16 Tools ComparedUpdated September 22, 2026Best Web Scraping Tools 2026: 12 Compared, Free and PaidUpdated October 5, 2026
Get your API key →Explore the Web Access API
© 2026 StringEU and UK GDPR Article 27 representative — appointment verified by EuverifyBuilt in New York City 🗽 🍎